An AI executive assistant you can call, message, or ping - across Slack/Teams, email, calendar, WhatsApp, and voice.
Product
AI Chief of StaffAI Executive AssistantAlyna vs ClawdbotAlyna vs OpenClawAlyna vs NemoClawAlyna vs MerlinPricingLegal
Privacy PolicyNewsletter
Product news and behind-the-scenes updates.
Deciding between a human executive assistant and an AI often comes down to cost and fit. This guide lays out real-world cost ranges for both so you can compare fairly - and when it makes sense to use one, the other, or both.
Base salary is only part of the picture. Fully loaded cost usually includes:
Rough fully loaded range: $65,000 - $150,000+ per year for one dedicated executive assistant. For a fractional or shared EA, costs are lower but scale with hours (e.g. $25 - $50+ per hour).
AI executive assistants are usually subscription-based:
So per executive, you're looking at ~$600 - $1,800 per year for an AI vs $65,000 - $150,000+ for a human EA. The AI is orders of magnitude cheaper on a pure cost basis; the right comparison is what work each does and when you need a human.
So the comparison isn't "one human vs one AI" in the abstract - it's "what work do I need, and what's the most cost-effective way to get it?"
Modern AI executive assistants offer capabilities that go beyond what even experienced human EAs typically provide:
Cost implication: You'd need multiple specialized staff (EA + research analyst + automation specialist) to match these capabilities, easily $150k - $300k+ in combined salaries. The AI does it all for $600 - $1,800/year.
An AI-only approach can be enough when:
Many founders and solo executives start here and add a human EA later when scope grows. For ROI framing, even 5 - 10 hours saved per week often justifies the AI subscription many times over - and that's before counting the research, monitoring, and automation capabilities included.
A human EA (or hybrid) is the better fit when:
In a hybrid setup, the human EA might use the AI for triage, drafts, scheduling, research, and monitoring; you pay for both, but the human's time goes to relationship work and judgment while the AI handles the high-volume tactical work. This is often the most cost-effective model: $65k for the human + $1,800 for the AI = $66,800, but the human works on 10x more valuable tasks. For more on that split, see AI vs human executive assistant.
| Item | Human EA (approx.) | AI EA (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost | $65,000 - $150,000+ | $600 - $1,800 |
| Scope | Full tactical + relationship | Tactical (triage, drafts, calendar, briefs) + multi-agent workflows, browser automation, web research, unlimited memory, heartbeat monitoring |
| Availability | Business hours | 24/7 |
| Scale | One or a few principals | Per-seat subscription |
| Learning curve | 3 - 6 months to learn your style | Continuous learning from day one |
| Memory | Human memory limits | Unlimited memory, never forgets |
| Best for | Need for judgment, travel, relationships | Volume, speed, research, automation, monitoring, cost-sensitive |
The cost of an executive assistant (human) is typically $65,000 - $150,000+ fully loaded per year. An AI executive assistant is usually $600 - $1,800 per year per user. The AI wins on cost for tactical work and adds capabilities human EAs don't have (multi-agent workflows, browser automation, web research, unlimited memory, heartbeat monitoring). The human wins for relationship-heavy and ambiguous work. Many executives use both: AI for inbox, calendar, briefs, research, and automation; human for strategy and people. For a tool that fits that hybrid model with approval-first and audit, see Alyna.
Alyna is an AI executive assistant with multi-agent workflows, browser automation, web research, unlimited memory, and heartbeat monitoring - all at a fraction of the cost of a human EA, with approval-first control and full audit trails. See pricing and features.